Heartbleed bug: An application developer’s perspective

Heartbleed bug: An application developer’s perspective

As more businesses begin to engage in application development strategies, the security risks of not being highly meticulous throughout the lifecycle become clearer. Requirements management and record keeping are certainly important in terms of communicating progress and need to other parties in a given company, but are equally as critical to ensuring the most secure and efficient process of application lifecycle management.

Several threats to the longevity and success of an application can be related to poor record keeping and requirements management procedures, including exiting employees, lack of oversight and inefficient development. As such, utilization of tools that can help to simultaneously streamline these procedures in the lifecycle for speed-related purposes and ensure more accurate data oversight is recommended for the average development team.

The bug dilemma
One of the biggest security threats in the modern IT landscape is a bug, which is not necessarily a virus or worm that is implemented by a malicious attacker, but rather a hole in the framework of infrastructure, applications or management frameworks. Application Development Trends Magazine recently explained some of the ways in which the Heartbleed bug has highlighted risks in open-source software management and involvement.

The source stated that one of the risks of open-sourcing is a lack of accurate and persistent communication among the parties involved in development and management, which can quickly lead to bugs. This specific bug is being classified as one of the most widespread and dangerous ones in history considering the fact that it impacted the OpenSSL encryption technology that is used among two-thirds of the websites currently on the Internet.

According to the news provider, software developers, as well as stakeholders that rely upon this open-sourced software, have increased support of adjustments and offered financial incentives to those who are tasked with making the necessary repairs. While this is a large-scale ordeal, business leaders should recognize the similar risks that come with internal procedures.

Lessons learned
Even when a company does not participate in open-source software development procedures, application lifecycle management can be difficult to navigate. This is why smaller teams can benefit from progressive solutions such as Smart Office4DevOps that help to minimize the risks of errors and bugs that subsequently lead to security threats and inefficiencies.

By covering the requirements management and record-keeping processes early on in the lifecycle, development teams will enjoy more success later on.

Share the Post

About the Author